EllaWeb3

Good news frens, @bitget just launched the On-chain Trading Competition Round 128 with @wojakcto 👀 Trade $Wojak on-chain and compete for a share of 50,000 USDT in rewards. Top rewards look strong: – Top 1–3: 2,000 USDT each – Top 4–5: 1,500 USDT – Top 6–10: 1,000 USDT Simple rule: register first, trade more, rank higher. Especially for meme degens: http://bitget.com/events/onchain-hunt/233358?clacCode=AA663TA7

The latest DeFi exploit triggered a sharp reaction but the bigger picture may not be as simple as it looks. After the $292M KelpDAO hack, total value locked across DeFi dropped by roughly $13B in a short period, leading to familiar claims that the sector is breaking again. But the data suggests something else. A large part of that decline wasn’t direct capital loss. It came from leveraged positions unwinding, where the same collateral is reused multiple times. When that structure breaks, TVL can fall much faster than actual capital leaving the system. In other words, the headline number overstates the real damage. At the same time capital didn’t just disappear. It moved. Protocols like Spark saw TVL jump significantly over the same weekend, showing that liquidity is still active, just rotating toward perceived safer venues. This isn’t new for DeFi. The space has gone through larger shocks before, from major bridge hacks to ecosystem-wide collapses and has continued operating after each one. What like

Slowly seeing USD1 show up in more places BTC and ETH pairs going live on @Bybit_Official is one of those small steps that usually matter more over time Liquidity, accessibility, it all starts to add up Not loud but consistent

The conversation around Bitcoin and quantum risk is starting to feel more real again. The issue isn’t about mining or the network stopping. Even in a worst case, the chain would keep running. Blocks would still be produced. The real concern is ownership. Current estimates suggest that around 6.9M $BTC could already be exposed in a future quantum scenario. That includes early wallets, long-dormant coins and even Satoshi’s holdings. The reason is fairly simple. Once a wallet makes a transaction its public key becomes visible on-chain and that changes its security assumptions over the long term. If quantum computing reaches the level some researchers are pointing to, that gap between public key and private key may not hold the way it does today. What makes this more complicated is not just the technology but how Bitcoin evolves. There are proposals for quantum-resistant upgrades but no clear path or coordination yet. Unlike other ecosystems, Bitcoin doesn’t move quickly or under a single roadmap, and that’s usually seen as a strength. In this case, it could also be the challenge. So the discussion isn’t really about if the network survives. It’s about whether it can coordinate a major security shift before the risk becomes practical.

Bitcoin is starting to look a bit different this month. After months of weakness, it’s now holding above $77K and up over 13% in April, on track for its strongest month in about a year. The move isn’t random. Here’s what’s changing: - Around $5B in new USDT supply has come in - Total stablecoin liquidity is pushing toward $150B - Spot demand is holding steady That usually means one thing. More liquidity entering the system. At the same time, markets aren’t reacting to macro headlines the way they were before. Risk is still there but it’s not driving price as much. The level to watch is pretty clear: $79K has been acting as resistance. If that breaks, momentum likely follows. If not, BTC probably stays in the same range for now. So the trend is improving but it still needs confirmation.

RWAs are evolving fast. The first wave was tokenized assets. The next wave is tokenized cash flows from real-world production. @aynigold sits right in that shift. $AYNI gives exposure to gold mining rewards, a category traditionally accessed through institutions, private deals, or direct mining operations. The mechanism is simple: → buy and stake $AYNI in the app → track rewards daily in the dashboard → claim PAXG rewards quarterly This week, new stakers can get 5% cashback in PAXG. Use code APRIL in the support chat and sign up here: https://ayni.gold/lp/a-shortcut-to-the-world-of-gold-mining?utm_source=X&utm_campaign=llwb PAXG is backed by physical gold and issued by Paxos, a regulated financial institution supervised by the NYDFS. Under the hood: •⁠ ⁠real mining operations tied to the fully licensed Minerales San Hilario concession in Peru •⁠ ⁠production-based reward logic •⁠ ⁠smart contracts audited by CertiK and PeckShield •⁠ ⁠Turnkey-powered wallet for smoother onboarding This is where RWAs get interesting: assets onchain, cash flows onchain, real output distributed onchain.

Good news frens, @bitget just launched the On-chain Trading Competition Round 128 with @wojakcto 👀 Trade $Wojak on-chain and compete for a share of 50,000 USDT in rewards. Top rewards look strong: – Top 1–3: 2,000 USDT each – Top 4–5: 1,500 USDT – Top 6–10: 1,000 USDT Simple rule: register first, trade more, rank higher. Especially for meme degens: http://bitget.com/events/onchain-hunt/233358?clacCode=AA663TA7

The latest DeFi exploit triggered a sharp reaction but the bigger picture may not be as simple as it looks. After the $292M KelpDAO hack, total value locked across DeFi dropped by roughly $13B in a short period, leading to familiar claims that the sector is breaking again. But the data suggests something else. A large part of that decline wasn’t direct capital loss. It came from leveraged positions unwinding, where the same collateral is reused multiple times. When that structure breaks, TVL can fall much faster than actual capital leaving the system. In other words, the headline number overstates the real damage. At the same time capital didn’t just disappear. It moved. Protocols like Spark saw TVL jump significantly over the same weekend, showing that liquidity is still active, just rotating toward perceived safer venues. This isn’t new for DeFi. The space has gone through larger shocks before, from major bridge hacks to ecosystem-wide collapses and has continued operating after each one. What like

Slowly seeing USD1 show up in more places BTC and ETH pairs going live on @Bybit_Official is one of those small steps that usually matter more over time Liquidity, accessibility, it all starts to add up Not loud but consistent

The conversation around Bitcoin and quantum risk is starting to feel more real again. The issue isn’t about mining or the network stopping. Even in a worst case, the chain would keep running. Blocks would still be produced. The real concern is ownership. Current estimates suggest that around 6.9M $BTC could already be exposed in a future quantum scenario. That includes early wallets, long-dormant coins and even Satoshi’s holdings. The reason is fairly simple. Once a wallet makes a transaction its public key becomes visible on-chain and that changes its security assumptions over the long term. If quantum computing reaches the level some researchers are pointing to, that gap between public key and private key may not hold the way it does today. What makes this more complicated is not just the technology but how Bitcoin evolves. There are proposals for quantum-resistant upgrades but no clear path or coordination yet. Unlike other ecosystems, Bitcoin doesn’t move quickly or under a single roadmap, and that’s usually seen as a strength. In this case, it could also be the challenge. So the discussion isn’t really about if the network survives. It’s about whether it can coordinate a major security shift before the risk becomes practical.

Bitcoin is starting to look a bit different this month. After months of weakness, it’s now holding above $77K and up over 13% in April, on track for its strongest month in about a year. The move isn’t random. Here’s what’s changing: - Around $5B in new USDT supply has come in - Total stablecoin liquidity is pushing toward $150B - Spot demand is holding steady That usually means one thing. More liquidity entering the system. At the same time, markets aren’t reacting to macro headlines the way they were before. Risk is still there but it’s not driving price as much. The level to watch is pretty clear: $79K has been acting as resistance. If that breaks, momentum likely follows. If not, BTC probably stays in the same range for now. So the trend is improving but it still needs confirmation.

RWAs are evolving fast. The first wave was tokenized assets. The next wave is tokenized cash flows from real-world production. @aynigold sits right in that shift. $AYNI gives exposure to gold mining rewards, a category traditionally accessed through institutions, private deals, or direct mining operations. The mechanism is simple: → buy and stake $AYNI in the app → track rewards daily in the dashboard → claim PAXG rewards quarterly This week, new stakers can get 5% cashback in PAXG. Use code APRIL in the support chat and sign up here: https://ayni.gold/lp/a-shortcut-to-the-world-of-gold-mining?utm_source=X&utm_campaign=llwb PAXG is backed by physical gold and issued by Paxos, a regulated financial institution supervised by the NYDFS. Under the hood: •⁠ ⁠real mining operations tied to the fully licensed Minerales San Hilario concession in Peru •⁠ ⁠production-based reward logic •⁠ ⁠smart contracts audited by CertiK and PeckShield •⁠ ⁠Turnkey-powered wallet for smoother onboarding This is where RWAs get interesting: assets onchain, cash flows onchain, real output distributed onchain.